Come on - I was using the concept of the reichstaag fire - I could have used sinking of the Maine , but the Reichstaag fire is a little more famous. If you want to invoke Godwin's Law, I will aquiesce and stop posting on this thread.
Quote:
|
No one should ever be bitten by a shark because the gumint knows damn well the ocean is full of them
|
Set up a straw man and knock it down. Well done. If you decide you want to actually evaluate anything before you dismiss the idea, here is a good place to start:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/index.html
Maybe I am wrong. Maybe Bush really did not know anything about terrorists, airplanes, and the WTC - like Condi Rice said. If, however, they did know, would you even be able to acknowledge it? Would you think that the ends justified the means?
Yes, hindsght is 20:20. When anybody does an investigation, they try to work their way back from the event - along the way the find pieces of information that point the investigator in different directions. Simply because a person can discern a pattern after the fact does not necessarily mean that the pattern did not exist or that it was an aberration.
Are you really aware of the information that you are so readily dismissing?
I am not standing on a soapbox. i am just trying to make a point. I think Bush is a crooked elitist f*ck, and I am trying to prove it.