The Cellar - View Single Post

aimeecc · 01-14-2008, 01:09 PM

I agree. The US should not attack just based on WMD. Pakistan and India have had WMDs since the 90s, yet we did not attack them. France has WMDs, but we don't attack her either. And true, we didn't do it for any altruistic reason - to save the Iraqi people.

My point is that AD continually makes it point to say we invaded based on WMD that don't exist and that the UN was making progress. The UN was not making progress, and it cannot be ascertained that Iraq did not have WMD, considering for several decades Iraq did. AD needs to base his accusations against the US on fact, not on feelings of hatred towards the US.

01-14-2008, 01:09 PM	#28
aimeecc Super Intendent Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 249	I agree. The US should not attack just based on WMD. Pakistan and India have had WMDs since the 90s, yet we did not attack them. France has WMDs, but we don't attack her either. And true, we didn't do it for any altruistic reason - to save the Iraqi people. My point is that AD continually makes it point to say we invaded based on WMD that don't exist and that the UN was making progress. The UN was not making progress, and it cannot be ascertained that Iraq did not have WMD, considering for several decades Iraq did. AD needs to base his accusations against the US on fact, not on feelings of hatred towards the US.