Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tw
By not naming his provider, the dealer is a 'prime contractor' and therefore fully responsible for integrity (safety) of the product. This dealer sold dangerous product and is 100% guilty for selling a defective product.
That 100% guilt upon the dealer is completely independent of another irresponsible action by the user.
|
But is it a "defect" when crystal meth gives the user a heart attack, or just a known risk? Gun manufacturers are not responsible when the buyers accidentally shoot themselves, why is this drug dealer automatically responsible for the fact that drugs are inherently dangerous?