Quote:
Originally Posted by Undertoad
And so the question remains: If we disagree over what invasion means, does the Constitution say anything about who decides whose meaning is the correct one?
|
No document should have to bear the burden of settling disputes over definitions of words in the way you are suggesting.
Let me explain: If I have a contract stating that I will be paid $100 dollars to paint a fence, I can't turn around and claim that I should be paid $100 because I pissed on the fence. I can't say that the contract has to specify that painting the fence means painting it and not pissing on it, shitting on it, sneezing on it, etc.
I'm not being sneaky by signing this contract, then pissing on the fence and demanding payment. Because that's stupid.
Words mean things. Invasion means invasion.