is that right? that's kind of what i meant by this:
Quote:
|
which leads you down the road toward a tree falling in the woods......are rights there without someone to excercise or defend them?
|
I guess i left out the part about the 'person to defend them from' ....although it was inferred in the 'defend them' part.....
in isolation, your rights do not evaporate though, do they? if the tree falls, it still makes a sound.....doesn't it?
in the context of the original question, my point was more along the lines of: A judgement of morality is only as meaningful as the judged allow it to be. If two same sex people find that they love each other...it is only their morality that applies. The reality is subjective. no spoon. no morals.
sorry i'm repeating myself...i'm sure you get what i'm saying. you're smarter than I am.