Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
Much of this is traceable to voting officials (political appointees) who have as much technical knowledge as women do about skin creams.
|
Voting machines in Ohio, due to spending money on products from companies such as Diebold and ESS, do not meet minimal security standards. As was obvious in original posts here, those computer voting machines are defective. But those who are 'computer literate' (?) bought them anyway. Why? If computerized; therefore it must be better? Why do we need immigrants? View what political party appointed officials did in Ohio? Simple research shows why all 'less than two year old' voting machines are defective. From the AP by Julie Carr Smyth on 14 Dec 2007:
Quote:
The state's top elections official recommended Friday that Ohio counties replace their touch-screen voting machines because the devices in use for roughly two years are vulnerable to manipulation. ...
The state's review involved touch-screen machines built by Election Systems & Software, Hart Intercivic and Diebold Inc.'s Premier Election Solutions. Some Ohio counties started using them in November 2005, and the rest in May 2006.
|
This voting official did not purchase these machines; she inherited the problem. After doing simple research, Ohio's voting machines, bought years after above (2004) The Cellar posts, have problems defined in these posts.