In the process of excercising your rights by shooting someone in the head, doesn't that mean that you're violating someone else's right? Or taking that right away?
If it's a right and it's based on the bill of rights, why do people still have to go to court to defend themselves after excercising their rights?
Surely if it's a right, it must be self evident why you shot someone in the head.
__________________
Kind words are the music of the world. F. W. Faber
|