Quote:
Originally Posted by classicman
Exactly when did I suggest anything of the sort? I simply asked a question. You needn't be so rude as to make implications where none should exist.
|
My most polite posts are rude and my most rude posts are polite. The only thing you should have read are the facts. Any emotion you might perceive? Assume it exists only to confuse you. Only the facts are relevant. One fact is that bin Laden is America’s Enemy #1. There is no greater criminal to any patriotic American – which is a specific reference to both Urbane Guerrilla and lookout123. Again – the facts.
If you read any praise or insult, then you are reading something that is not there – or may even just test you to see whether you can separate your emotions from the facts.
If you think anything was rude, well, that was 100% your emotional response. Why did you waste time with a perceived insult rather than address only the facts? Nothing I posted (or in this post) was intended to be rude or praise. It was intended to address only one fundamental question with blunt, explicit accuracy: “when do we go after bin Laden?” It also identifies extremists who would deny this question because the question exposes the mental midget president for who he is. When do we go after American Enemy #1? America has no greater living criminal even though wacko extremists would deny it for what is more important to them - a political agenda.