Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

By "in the public eye" do you mean "established by the government"? As far as I've seen, rkzenrage has only called the latter unconstitutional. The former is up to the private entity who owns the property which may be in the public eye. He (and I) may be happy when such an entity discontinues a policy based on the assumption that everyone is Christian, but that is a different issue from Constitutionality.