[ScottSolomon]

Radar,

Your method of argument leaves much to be desired. Basically all you did was refute everything I said - but offered no clarifying arguments to make your position seem more lucid. I am sorry, but I feel that - whatever the argument I use that may disagree with you - you will simply refute it.

I really don't care to play, "I say it is so - so it is so." SO I'll just leave it here:

You are wrong on many levels with regard to globalization, the impact of unions, the power of the working class shareholder, constitutional interpretation, and macromeconomics. I don't really feel like typing a long diatribe about each flawed argument you made. If you feel that this is a victory, so be it. Congratulations.

If, however, you want to get a broader understanding of law, macroeconomics, and the constiution, I think you should take a trip to the library and look for books from authors that are not simply trying to prove that the Libertarian ethos is beyond question.

Thanks