[Radar]

What you are refusing to recognize here is that it's your opinion that the ruling is not sticking to the constitution. The Judges opinion is otherwise.

What you're failing to realize is that opinion has nothing to do with it. It's a matter of fact, not of opinion. If a judge says it's ok for me to enslave someone, they're acting directly against the constitution. Their ruling is unconstitutional in it's face. It's not my opinion of whether it's Constitutional versus theirs, it's a cold hard fact.

Ergo, the system of courts set up in Section 1 has the power to judge cases.

On that we agree.

Can the Supremes make an unconstitutional decision? Their power does not extend above the Constitution. But they have the power to judge all cases arising under it.

No part of the Constitution ever has a day off. No part may be legally suspended by government. All of the constitution are applicable at all times.

Now, sadly, there is little practical difference. But that's part of why it's a fluid system; we do the best we can, knowing that perfection is impossible.

I agree that our system is imperfect, however when the rules are followed it's a lot more perfect. And all branches of government are violating their authority and breaking the rules.

You also seem to be arguing that when the IRS takes you into custody and threatens to throw you in jail, this evidence will save you in court.

If that's the impression I gave, I was incorrect in how I presented the information. The truthful and factual information I've given about the Constitutionality 16th amendment and the legality of income taxation will never save someone in court because the courts will never rule against income taxes. They are part of a judicial conspiracy to defend and protect them. What saves me and others like me in court is our knowledge of the law, courtroom procedures, and rules of evidence.

If you look at the OJ Simpson case you know that people commit crimes and win in court. How do they do this? Because their lawyers were very good at keeping the prosecutors evidence out and their own evidence in while using tactics to make the prosecuters slip up.

If you're arrested for murder and the judge prevents you from having a lawyer, and decides not to give you a jury but just to send you to death row, you will win because they didn't follow proper procedure or the law.

Nobody will ever win in tax court trying to argue the law with judges because even though most judges know the income tax is unconstitutional they don't want to be the one responsible for such a huge decision. Judges are working for the government and want to get promotions and keep their political careers in tact. They'd never be so bold or honest as to overturn income taxes.