I reckon you're just shit stirring.
Srsly, of course the distinctions are arbitrarily placed. How would you solve that issue? I don't have an answer, so I offered my view of what the distinction is.
Quote:
|
Some good points, I grant you. The club would probably prefer to keep players than have to dump them. But even a friendly club investigation still doesn't constitute fair trial. And particularly tough on the non-charged guy.
|
They broke the terms of their contract, so basically, that was it. They signed an agreement to behave in a certain way in public and they failed.
To go one step further, the players had both been drinking, so perhaps their bad judgement started from the point when they decided it'd be a good idea to go to a nightclub fully loaded.