Quote:
Originally posted by quzah
Let's get real here. This is not a fight about "liberation". It's a fight about oil. If it was simply billed as such, I'd have much less a problem with it. Sure, I'd still be against it, but at lest I wouldn't have to be fed my daily dose of bullshit by the media.
|
Let's examine coorelational logic for a moment. 'A' happens, and at the same time that 'A' happens, 'B' is present. Therefore, 'B' is the cause of 'A'.
I think this is what you're doing here. Because if we use your logic, then we would never be able to attack any country that exports oil, for any reason. Because even if if the reason were justified, people would still conclude that it was just for oil.
It's true that it <i>could</i> be just for oil. But it's also true that it could be for liberation, or to prevent a future threat. You need evidence before you can start discarding potential causes. Real evidence, not speculation.
Quote:
Originally posted by quzah
Again, let's face some facts. Iraq has done exactly what evil in the last decade? Oh, that's right, nothing.
|
This statement is false. Did you do any research on Iraq at all before you reached this conclusion?
Quote:
Originally posted by quzah
the only reason anyone at all ever starves in the world is because of bickering goverments
|
This statement is also false. For example, what about the potato famine in Ireland?