09-21-2007, 05:30 PM
|
#103
|
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theotherguy
That is what I am saying. I am not sure if you are agreeing with me or not.
Let's say the malpractice ins gets cut in half so they now have, just to simply things, an extra $200,000 in profit for the group. That doesn't mean that they will each get an extra $50,000. They probably would like to spend that money on extra support staff or new equipment or more current magazines in the waiting room. In my business, an extra $3,000,000 to our bottom line does not immediately get divided up among the managers and partners. It does increase our bonuses, but not by a total of $3,000,000.
I am not saying that it would absolutely not change how much money the doc takes home. It might. It might not. I was simply refuting Clod's claim that a large portion of a doc's 100K salary goes to pay for malpractice insurance.
|
We are in agreement. But when people pay out such large sums the only way they see it is that it is robbery, which it is in many cases.
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
|
|
|