Quote:
Originally posted by Undertoad
The thing is, both Chomsky and Roy fail to offer any suggestions on how to manage Hussein otherwise. They prefer the status quo:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/...lex/index.html
US/UK forces found a UN complex that was bulging with undistributed food - in Basra, the very city in which Roy claims a humanitarian disaster created by 4 days of US/UK "siege", which has in fact been starving for ages.
CZ, you paying attention? Every morning's news disproves these numbnuts further. Or is it all just more propaganda?
|
Undertoad, this is not dialog. You act like everything you say it's pretty obvious and people that say otherwise are dolts and numbnuts.
You're turning what could be a good debate into a flamewar, and that's pretty useless.
Both texts I posted contain some very serious and interesting points, and the fact that you, being obviously pro war and pro US government, chose to make ridicule of it and react in a very angry way suggests that It must have hit a nerve.
Know only one thing (and this I can tell you from experience): The great majority of the world disproves the war and US policy in general.
Simply ignoring that with such an obnoxious attitude doesn't improve things. What Bush is managing to do is amazing. He's singlehandedly uniting the world against the US. That alone shows that his principal motive is not stopping foreign terrorism (American and American-supported terrorism was always OK. Keep in mind I come from a country where the elected president was deposed by the CIA, and the following dictatorship killed many people in my parent's generation).
So go ahead and call me a dolt, a moron, whatever you like. It doesn't mean much coming from you. I just hope you wise up eventually.