View Single Post
Old 04-01-2003, 04:08 PM   #55
elSicomoro
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
Quote:
Originally posted by russotto
Arnett wasn't canned for what he reported. He was canned for editorializing in an interview with Iraqi TV; he was making propaganda for the enemy, not reporting news. Unless it turns out the man had a pistol aimed at his back, he got what he deserved.
I know he wasn't canned for his reporting. I was merely commenting (in my e-mail to Kojo Nnamdi) about the perspective Arnett was providing in his news reports.

The way I see it, who the fuck really cares what Peter Arnett says to Iraqi TV? Negative comments and media coverage thus far haven't hurt public opinion. And he was reporting for a network that's pulling in *guesstimate* maybe 20-30% of news watchers overall in the US. Besides, it's not like it was Walter Cronkite.

In addition, I don't see that much difference between him saying what he said on Iraqi TV, and what other reporters/anchors do when they go on the late night shows. All in all, I think it was just a bad decision on Arnett's part, made at the wrong time.

Last I read (it's been a slow news day, it seems), Geraldo was lashing out at MSNBC, saying they were responsible for the rumors.
elSicomoro is offline