View Single Post
Old 03-23-2003, 09:52 AM   #11
Undertoad
Radical Centrist
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cottage of Prussia
Posts: 31,423
And to think about this a slightly different way --

I am easily convinced there isn't a moral duty to stop torture and killing just because one can.

What intrigues me now is why other countries wanted to stop the coalition from stopping torture and killing... almost at any political cost.

They wanted that torture and killing to continue... even if someone else was going to take the responsibility of stopping it... preferring their big oil contracts.

So, isn't "No blood for oil" a really really TERRIBLE anti-war slogan right about now?
Undertoad is offline   Reply With Quote