The Cellar - View Single Post

richlevy · 07-08-2007, 02:59 PM

I do think calling this act 'circumcision' is a gross misnomer. It's the difference between losing some skin and actually having the genitals themselves partially or wholly removed.

One solution is to only allow it to women over the age of 13 who will be armed during the procedure. They can simply withdraw consent by blowing the head off of the person performing the procedure. This would have the effect of significantly improving the selection process for the procedure by having the practitioners keenly interested in only performing the procedure on 'women' who really want it.

07-08-2007, 02:59 PM	#26
richlevy King Of Wishful Thinking Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Philadelphia Suburbs Posts: 6,669	I do think calling this act 'circumcision' is a gross misnomer. It's the difference between losing some skin and actually having the genitals themselves partially or wholly removed. One solution is to only allow it to women over the age of 13 who will be armed during the procedure. They can simply withdraw consent by blowing the head off of the person performing the procedure. This would have the effect of significantly improving the selection process for the procedure by having the practitioners keenly interested in only performing the procedure on 'women' who really want it. __________________ Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE! I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. -- Barack Hussein Obama