[tw]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

It is unconscionable to leave Chavez alone when all the misery his government can engender can come to a screeching halt once Chavez suddenly dies.

Urbane Guerrilla, who claims to be libertarian, instead advocates pre-emption. We must save Venezuela from itself. They voted for Chavez. Now we must invade them. We must burn the village to save it. That is not libertarian thinking. That is savage totalitarianism.

Urbane Guerrilla advocates totalitarianism. "We must use pre-emption to save them from themselves." That is the mindset of an extremist who must impose his will on all others.

Messing up oligarchies and disposing of socialists is how the world gets better

Again, only Urbane Guerrilla knows what is better. *Pre-emption*. No wonder UG could not comprehend Thomas Barnett's "Blueprint For Action: A Future Worth Creating." UG's conundrum is demonstrated by the words arrogant, Libertarian, democracy, and totalitarianism.

Urbane Guerrilla's mindset preaches democracy while advocating totalitarianism. No wonder America cannot impose democracy in Iraq. We did pre-emption doing exactly what Urbane Guerrilla and TheMercenary now advocate for Venezuela. Do they evern learn from the lessons of history?

Arrogant is a term used by the weak of will or weakly motivated to disparage initiative and motivation of which they disapprove, most generally for reasons of infinitesimal worth, long before jettisoned as worthless by the one they're yelling at.

BS is right. Arrogant is when Urbane Guerrilla knows what is right for everyone else and imposes 'his wisdom' on them. The arrogant also claim to be Libertarian?

Claims to be Libertarian, preaches democracy, but advocates military totalitarian actions. UG is the ultimate example of arrogant.