Quote:
Originally Posted by jinx
Flint, I gotta say, I'm pretty disappointed with your point.
|
I'm not going to squabble over semantics. I don't have anything to say about archeology. I won't try to impress you with any fancy links or quotes I Googled to "prove you wrong" ... it doesn't have a thing to do with what I'm talking about here.
If you take a few steps back and look at the big picture, you might see all the meaningful discussions we could have had about the nature and origins of our American culture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
I don't see your name in that rhetorical question.
...
Does it serve us to state outright or imply, the Europeans prevailed because they were savages compared to the noble, peace loving, at one with nature, natives?
|
Am I allowed to respond to that one?
What I've been discussing is a comparison of
primary historical sources (what people who were actually there wrote about what was happening at the time of our two cultures meeting) versus the feel-good narrative provided by history textbooks.
In answer to your question: an honest, balanced look at history would serve us best. Today, we don't have that.