Quote:
tw sed
In fact some friends still are pissed that I called then after 11 PM on 1 Aug 1990 (woke them up) to tell them 'my' war had started.
So what is different here?
|
This really bothered me overnight.
I'll ask the same question of you. What's different here? Hussein resigned the first war with an agreement to disarm. Then he didn't. The UNSC voted 15-0 that he still has to disarm. Blix came back and said he's not disarming. Ritter said in 1998 that he wasn't disarming. What is different here? This is simply part 2 of the same war you wanted so badly before.
Clinton bombed Iraq too - after inspectors left the first time - was that OK? How about the no-fly zones - surely those are an obvious remnant of the first war. Can Iraqis fire anti-aircraft missiles at planes in the no-fly zone? If they do, aren't they disrespecting the agreements of the FIRST war cease-fire?