View Single Post
Old 03-29-2007, 09:05 PM   #25
TheMercenary
“Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo”
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Savannah, Georgia
Posts: 21,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce View Post
The question is could any other company do as well as KBR for a lot less money and why they charged the government billions for services NOT rendered.

Oh, and if you read the thread you'd know they are not leaving. I lied.
I have heard this argument a million times. After years on active duty I can tell you one thing. At the time of the deployment, no company, absolutely no company had the ablity, capacity, infrastructure, and history to provide us with what we needed to go to war, of for any other deployment for that matter. Historically I think you can look at the system over the years, and I mean 20 or so, and judge the way this situation got to where it is now, meaning that how did one company so totally domintate this market. Well guess what, when troops need support neither I or anyone else really gives a crap about how or where it comes from, as long is it is there when you need it and on time in running order. After that it just doesn't matter who is doing the supplying. Understand?
__________________
Anyone but the this most fuked up President in History in 2012!
TheMercenary is offline   Reply With Quote