The Cellar - View Single Post

mw451 · 01-16-2003, 07:21 PM

Uryoces, while I think your solution is an interesting solution, and the basis for a great covert action novel/movie, I don't think that it would satisfy GWBush. He is just hell-bent on getting rid of Saddam. Look at who is this biggest risk, North Korea or Iraq. North Korea is developing nukes, Saddam has nothing, (well nothing we've found yet). We should be turning our attention to N. Korea and disarming them first, then focus on terror/Osama, then Saddam.

Think about this, one Stealth Bomber flies into N. Korea and bombs the reactor site, destroying it. One bomber, one bomb. Conflict over.

Why haven't we done this???

It's the simplest solution to the problem.

Your opinion?

01-16-2003, 07:21 PM	#3
mw451 Disorderly Orderly Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Northern Virginia/DC Posts: 53	Uryoces, while I think your solution is an interesting solution, and the basis for a great covert action novel/movie, I don't think that it would satisfy GWBush. He is just hell-bent on getting rid of Saddam. Look at who is this biggest risk, North Korea or Iraq. North Korea is developing nukes, Saddam has nothing, (well nothing we've found yet). We should be turning our attention to N. Korea and disarming them first, then focus on terror/Osama, then Saddam. Think about this, one Stealth Bomber flies into N. Korea and bombs the reactor site, destroying it. One bomber, one bomb. Conflict over. Why haven't we done this??? It's the simplest solution to the problem. Your opinion? __________________ The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or... the one. -- Spock