The Cellar - View Single Post

Undertoad · 01-04-2003, 01:05 PM

I was wrong on the amount of power it will generate towards the national Kyoto goals.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ower_col&ncid=

The story says " It will generate about 650 gigawatt hours (GWh) a year toward Australia's mandated renewable energy target, which requires electricity retailers to supply 9,500 GWh of renewable energy a year by 2010."

So not 1/50th of the power, more like 1/15th of the power they want to go towards Kyoto.

If one gets the land for free perhaps it is cost-effective.

01-04-2003, 01:05 PM	#3
Undertoad Radical Centrist Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Cottage of Prussia Posts: 31,423	I was wrong on the amount of power it will generate towards the national Kyoto goals. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...ower_col&ncid= The story says " It will generate about 650 gigawatt hours (GWh) a year toward Australia's mandated renewable energy target, which requires electricity retailers to supply 9,500 GWh of renewable energy a year by 2010." So not 1/50th of the power, more like 1/15th of the power they want to go towards Kyoto. If one gets the land for free perhaps it is cost-effective.