Quote:
Originally Posted by tw
Are you really saying that Saddam wasn't evil? OMG - please justify that statement. And you still owe me an apology!(yesman065) If it was a joke, then the joke was also posted my me. (Covered all options with that post.)
Meanwhile, define evil. Tell me how you know evil using facts. Define evil using facts and logic. After all, Saddam was only doing what kings, queens, and the church did hundreds of years ago. Do you also call the pope evil? If so, then why ... what are your facts?
|
You didn't cover squat and you didn't answer my question again! - as usual!!!
Here is your definition since you want to play this game:
EVIL In religion and ethics, Evil refers to the "bad" aspects of the behavior and reasoning of human beings — those which are deliberately
void of conscience, and show
a wanton penchant for destruction. Evil is sometimes defined as the
absence of a good which could and should be present; the absence of which is a void in what should be.
In most cultures, the word is used to describe acts, thoughts, and ideas which are thought to (either directly or causally) bring about affliction and death — the opposite of goodness.
Hmm, lets take a poll on this one shall we? Somebody who knows how please set it up - thanks. Whether the pope, kings, queens, a church, a gov't. or anyone else is/are evil has nothing to do with this conversation. NO wiggle room here - defend your incorrect undefesible position that Saddam is not evil - you said it - lets see it. oh and show your work!