Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaggieL
I do maintain *legal* gun ownership means less violent crime.
Legal gun ownership does *not* include
-- concealed carry without a permit in jurisdictions where a permit is required,
-- use of a firearm in comission of a felony,or posession of firearms by those not legally qualiied to posess them: convicted felons, those to whom firearms are prohibited as a condition of their probation
-- handgun posession by anyone under 21.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tw
So then you are in favor of gun control.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MaggieL
No.
|
MaggieL posts justifications for Gun Control. Then denies she approves of gun control. Obviously a paradox. She previously advocated free access to guns by all. Now she says we should restrict who has access to guns? Which is it MaggieL? Either you advocate gun control or you advocate unrestricted access to guns. They are mutually exclusive. Which is it? How can you advocate restrictions on gun access and then not support gun control? They are same thing. And they both contradict your open opposition to gun control. How do you explain that contradiction?