[Cairo]

Thanks for the explanation, Nic Name.
You might want to rethink the Canadian approach to privacy, because anytime a so-called "voice of the people" has his paycheck signed by the Government,
there is a huge conflict of interest involved.
Regardless of my contempt of the ACLU, the Government does not sign their paychecks.
Poindexter is not sworn in to uphold constitutional privacy, John Ashcroft is...so your Radwanski is a glorified John Ashcroft.

The electoral college is a safeguard put into place to stop voting fraud and ballot stuffing from affecting the outcome of the election. The US Supreme Court decided nothing of the kind, contrary to popular DemocRAT belief(they are wrong), the USSC's job is to keep check over State Supremes who fail to uphold it's own State's law on a National based issue(Presidency). Checks and balances.

We have certain procedures that must be followed and adhered to in order to "tweak" the Constitution. Any "free constitutional do over" would set a terrible precedence to go in and chip away at any of it, against the people's will.

You are correct in that no system in the World is the end all, be all. In a perfect World, we humans would be perfect...We're not.