|
Gee thanks gang for all those our piercing and insightful rebuttals.
I can't get to excited by the insights posted by other posters when they just hold themselves to some superior knowledge they can't seem to share.
Opinions are like butt-holes, everyone got one.
Somebody tell me what they observe. Being an observer of life myself and seeing humans in there best and worst conditions I come to understand a little something of how the world works.
Being that many of you are young and I can see it in your posts, your idealist. That’s normal. I was when I was young too. Some of the posters are a bit older and have in some way supported some what the points I've made.
I answered the threads question as I have seen and come to know about the world and the interactions between men and women.
If anyone would read ancient Greek and Roman plays and the writings of great authors such as Shakespeare and William James this subject matter is not new nor are the point I make mine alone.
There is the world we want and the world that is and as you get older you begin to see the difference. It doesn't mean that you can't have both, in some way; it just means you see the difference. We are fortunate to live in a culture and society where we can indulge ourselves in our illusions and reach for more than what we can grasp. Humans under stress tend to revert to base instincts.
Men and women are equal but not in identical ways. That’s where idealisms and reality between the sexes part ways. A women’s sexual history isn’t a non-factor and no matter how you want to believe its not, no man, being honest with himself, can’t deny weighing it.
|