[tw]

[last of three consecutive posts]

So why do we so deny the obvious - a civil war created by the "Mission Accomplished" war? Why do we simply forget how often George Jr and his administration outrightly lied to us - and have not stopped? Why instead do we forget how obvious this civil war was as even Scowcroft and Brzezinski accurately detailed? Why do we forget how anti-American we were in our 'big dic' mentality back then as to even blame Linda Ronstadt and the Dixie Chicks for being absolutely correct?

Singer Linda Ronstadt Ejected by Las Vegas Casino on 23 Jul 2004
Nothing involving the WTC and Pentagon attacks can be discussed without mentioning the 6 Aug 2001 briefing that George Jr apparently did not even read. What was he waiting for? A formal invitation to the party from Osama? The contentiouos nature - and the reason why those extremists felt justified in creating civil disturbances in a Rhonstadt concert is directly traceable to the current political climate in America - as created a mental midget president and his administration. An administration that even justified the outing of a CIA agent and Gitmoizing of innocent Iraqi prisioners.

And finally from BennyHill on 10 April 2003 who was questioned for a post that was accurate in god bless america:

the violence justifies the violence?
the death justifies more death?
The U.S. do not liberate, have other interest in Iraq.

To which UT replies:

Time will show us whether the US is going to be a conqueror, or whether it will give the country back to the Iraqis, as it says it will.

Time will show us whether there are any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons in Iraq.

Bennyhill, if the US does give the country back, and if the weapons are there, will you apologize for your accusations?

Because I promise you, if the US does not give the country back, and if no weapons are found, I will apologize to you -- and I will work to change the US government.

A predictable and predicted civil war is increasing. Do we give them back their country? Or do we stay another 10 to 15 years as is required with too few troops? After spending how many $billions, still, Saddam provided Iraq even with more electricity. Even electricity is counted in single digit hours per day - which is no longer new because America has made Iraq that much worse. Iraq even creates less electricity and is a net importer of oil. Do we stay only to lose another Vietnam war because we continued to deny "A Bright and Shining Lie". You did learn from that history - or condemned to relive it?

Review these posts to appreciate how obvious all this was back then. This civil war was predicted because of what America - mostly ill educated and religous fanatic supporters of George Jr - have accomplished. "Mission Accomplished". It was predictable and predicted how many years ago when so many American citizens were thinking with emotions rather than using blunt and brutal lessons from history. "Mission Accomplished".

Meanwhile, I make no aplogies for stating facts up front and blunt without any regards to what adult children need - things stated politically correct. I am not politically correct. I am blunt honest. Either we put in those 500,000 troops now and settle this - or we get out. Those remain the only two viable options. Don't like it. Fine. "Not liking" is a silly emotion. Those remain the only two options. Either we are in or we are totally out. All other options will mean another Vietnam defeat.

Anyone yet ready to make either hard decision - or have a better idea? Silence in The Cellar. How many other alternative were posted? Two years of silent now - and so many who so hate America as to blindly restate presidental impeachable lies.