Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kitsune
This is, I think, what makes this debate so difficult. ~snip
|
I'd make that, debate impossible. There can be no debate when one side is debating and the other side preaching.
And, they're preaching literal acceptance of a text written 60 to 90 years, minimum, after the alleged incidents.... by people that told us the world was flat.
Criminologists have proven, that eye witness accounts are not all that reliable, by comparing them to surveillance videos. How can handed down oral histories be more accurate than eye witnesses?
Oh, I forgot, the authors (and translators), were guided by the hand of God....case closed.
