Quote:
|
Originally Posted by smoothmoniker
Explain to me why this is a bad thing. If you look at the quality of most of those books being published, I don't know that we would be better off for having read them.
If I decide to watch something on the History Channel or PBS instead of reading a trash fiction novel, isn't that a better choice? Why is the printed word more sacred than then spoken or visual word?
|
I think most of the music on the radio today is crap. That doesn't stop me from enjoying some of it.
I enjoyed the Jurassic Park movies, but I've also read the books. The images and thoughts in the books become part of me that wouldn't be there if I had not read them.
I just finished a collection of writings on software development that gave me a number of thoughts and ideas I would not have gotten had I not taken the trouble.
You don't have to read everything that's published, surely. But I think it's awfully limiting to exclude an entire medium.
*not seriously - but*
The main reason to read books instead of watch TV is that books have no commercials or fund-raisers.