[tw]

Originally Posted by Jordon

I said that everyone should be able to have a Civil Union with the same legal rights.

Fine - everyone read that previously - which is why these simple questions exist. Are you saying that laws should make no distinction between same sex and opposite sex marriages? What you said and what the question asks are similar but different conditions. You still did not answer the question, so as Ted Koppel said, I will ask it again. Your answer only reiterated what you said previously AND does not answer the question. The question exists because your post does not answer the question. Are you "saying that laws should make no distinction between same sex and opposite sex marriages?"

I NEVER SAID THAT. Parroting a lie over and over does not add credibility.

Questions don't make accusations nor do they lie. Questions ask - and the questions are so softball that you should be welcoming them. You were asked to clarify a simple statement; that sacraments should be denied to same sex marriages. You were asked if that were your opinion. My god. Even a simple yes or no answer would at least attempted to answer the question. The question was asked because - obviously and again - your 'quote' does not answer that question.

Clearly no lesbian or gay would eat because only hetrosexuals eat. Your example is just as irrelevant - does not answer the question. Two out of two questions still not answered - complete with attack accusations of statement never made. So much fear. Do you just not want to answer the questions? Why quote what is not understood? If your quotes were understood, then questions would not be asked. Why requote the same incomprehensible replies? Why not just answer simple questions?

Another lie.

A lie about what? How does one lie when it is only a question? A question asking only what you said?

I said, and say yet again, that seven year olds don't need to know about homosexuality.

Does not need know about sex acts in homosexuality, OR not even know that same sex couples living together exist? But then, only asking the same question again. Same question that you reply to and never answer.

I think that at least waiting for the onset of puberty, if not further, would be sufficient; and informing children of their existance is not advocating it as a normal or acceptable practice, as the book in question seems to be doing.

Well at least this is a start. Asking the same questions four times and finally getting part of one answer. Continue. Homosexuality is so rare and unacceptable that not even 1% of Americans would practice it? And what should these kids be told? That homosexuals live together or that homosexuals have sex? Simply and again asking same unanswered questions.