Rich, I know this is just a typo, but it's too good to gloss over:
Quote:
I find it so funny when Michelle Malkin soothes the conservatives by stating that the US interment of Japanese Americans was necessary.
|
About two days postmortem, it
is necessary. [Emph mine]
I wasn't ignoring Nagasaki, merely constructing a better-flowing and more concise sentence; it starts to clunk if I go for a pedantic completeness. I could have written precisely the same sentence of Nagasaki. Hiroshima carries the greater weight of meaning because it was the first.
Quote:
That's like hearing the 9/11 hijackers telling us they did it for the good of the USA.
|
No; the purveyors of antidemocracy do not have the moral authority to make such an argument believable. We, being a free people, in contention with anti-freedom people, do. That you choose not to accept that view has very little effect on its rightness.