Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie
I've already added Wal-Mart to the ever-growing list of institutions (and people, I'm proud to say) that, according to marichiko, lie and cheat. And, while we are on the subject of the list, as a consequence of your profound insights into our foreign policy as documented in another thread, I've sent a memo to Condi Rice that we need to dust off "Cold War" and "Domino Theory" and put them back into the forefront of our foreign policy doctrine where they belong.
|
Glad to see you're paying attention. What thread, BTW?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beestie
But, getting back to the topic at hand, I have three questions:
1. Are you saying that California would be better of by $86M if Wal-Mart closed its doors tomorrow? The only way I can make sense of that assertion is to assume that everyone who works at Wal-Mart turned down a higher paying job to work there...
Alternatively, you can link the study and I'll answer my own questions.
|
No, I am not making that leap of logic. I merely quoted what the study says tax payers must pay for Walmart workers. The figure is on page 10 here:
http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/lowwage/walmart.pdf