Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla
Any war, of any size and of any description, against any tyranny, is inherently moral. Transcendentally so. Some of you reading this, not understanding tyranny, seem not to believe that. The American Presidency is not a tyranny, thanks to even the power of the Leader Of The Free World being limited both in scope and in time.
|
So, when the US destablized governments and installed and/or supported dictators like Marcos, Shah Pahlavi, Saddam Hussein, Noriega, etc., it was perfectly moral and acceptable for people to shoot at us?
By your definition, Khomeni was a freedom fighter. I think I will have to disagree with you there.
As for the US presidency being limited in scope, it appears the current adminstration disagrees with you.
__________________
Exercise your rights and remember your obligations - VOTE!
I have always believed that hope is that stubborn thing inside us that insists, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that something better awaits us so long as we have the courage to keep reaching, to keep working, to keep fighting. --
Barack Hussein Obama