Most of your post was pretty good. Until you lost it at the end.
Quote:
Originally posted by Xugumad
And by the way: I would be very interested to see one incident where an Israeli soldier was bored and shot an innocent Palestinian walking the streets - without being provoked. So let's see your sources. I want names.(dhamsaic)
Unfortunately, I can easily provide that:
http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/news/2002/07/59092.php
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/upda...e_archives.htm
The recent event, in which civilians were out in a market, and an Israeli tank fired a warning shot into their midst, killing several, ought to be sufficient for you?
|
Maybe you missed it, but <b>I mentioned this very incident in my last post</b>. Guess what I said about it?
Hey, guess what. Where's the evidence that it was done <b>out of boredom</b>?
He/she already provided me with a source to back up their claim, and I acknowledged it very clearly and explicitly at the beginning of my post.
Quote:
By the way - resorting to cheap racial slang in order to imply that the previous poster may have been racially motivated, or in order to get some sort of emotional reaction out of him, was pretty damn low, dhamsaic. (Ah, yes. I see. It's okay to kill a couple of those dirty zionist kikes.) Your intention may have been that of irony, but it was fairly obvious flamebait.
Do you have to stoop to that, seeing how Israel is about to implement Apartheid-like laws regarding land ownership, etc, limiting it to Jews only?
|
Heh. Spare me the bullshit. First of all, your "but it was fairly obvious flamebait" directly follows "your intention may have been that of irony". How can you have it both ways?
Then we can get into your assumption that it actually was "obvious flamebait". For it to have been flamebait, it must have been my intention to draw flames. Which it wasn't. I use strong words. If it bothers you, then I recommend you don't read my posts.
I have been over this before with others, and I really have no desire to explain it again. But because I like you, I'll go ahead and do it this one last time.
<b>I employ racial slang to convey the dehumanization that one side feels for another</b>. This killing is made possible because neither side sees the other as human. Israel thinks the Palestinians are a bunch of camel jockeying sand niggers. Palestinians think that the Jews are dirty zionists. Of course, I refer only to the extremists in both camps.
I assume that the readers are intelligent; that I don't need to spell out every single fucking detail for them, that I don't need to always explicitly describe exactly what I am meaning. If you don't pick up on it, that's fine - but you are labeling it out of a gross ignorance on your part. How about you ask me what I mean next time?