View Single Post
Old 09-25-2005, 05:17 PM   #18
mitheral
Abecedarian
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonchi
This is particularly obvious in Starship Troopers, where the military is organized and deployed as if nothing progressed after WWII. The perfectly awful movie they made of that book has no choice but to go along, putting platoons on the ground with futuristic rifles to face the native enemy hand-to-hand. Obviously Heinlein, for all his imagination, did not forsee the US Military machine which simply bombs their adversaries into parking lots and THEN hits the ground to get picked off afterwards.
Actually I think he pinned the modern military fairly well. If you read it again you'll notice that Marines were used when humanity needed to secure a planet or otherwise project less than planet busting force. As Iraq has shown carpet bombing the enemy into submission isn't all that a military needs to be able to do. Subtler applications of force are often required. The protagonist of ST reflects that the navy could destroy any planet they wished but the Marines can make the application of force as personal as a punch in the face. And thru the course of the book that ability to inflect less than total damage is key. For example in getting the skinnys on humanities side in the war.

Ya, I'm a Heinlein fan can you tell?

His best work is The Moon is a harsh Mistress in my mind. I also loved Door into Summer. I also would have loved to see him rewrite Farnham's Freehold with out all the racial sub plots. It was right for the time but it distracts from some of the other elemnts of the story.

Practically the only work I didn't care for was Stranger. I think you need to have lived thru the 60's to really connect with that book.
mitheral is offline   Reply With Quote