View Single Post
Old 06-15-2005, 07:29 PM   #51
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
Quote:
All this nonsense about Rumsfeld's tactical objectives is totally irrelevant to the question. Topics about Rumsfeld and Boyd demonstrate how to confuse an issue - Rush Limbaugh style.
MWUHAHAHAHA. yes tw. that was my plan. confuse the issue to hide the truth - because lord knows, that no cellar thread ever shifts focus but for the evil machinations of a conservative.

FWIW i brought up Boyd and the like because of this statement -
Quote:
Rumsfeld overrode his generalss recommendations for overwhelming numbers.
Quote:
So you agree that Rumsfeld is a bad leader?
uh, hyeah! i don't believe he deliberately orchestrating the destruction of mankind. i do believe that he is too arrogant and shortsighted to take stock of his own abilities and shortfalls. without that knowledge he has been unable to build a support team to compliment his strengths.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote