Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf
I don't get it. If he was hired for a photo shoot, he had to sign a standard model release, and got paid for the work he did. Also, there should be a statute of limitations on the period of time in which he could sue for damages.
|
Without knowing the terms under which he did the photo shoot, there's no answering your first objection.
Since the unauthorized use was ongoing at the time he discovered it, the statute wouldn't be an issue.