Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Beestie
I am not interested in the likelihood of 100,000 fatalities but rather the actualhood of a real body count. Somebody needs to either cough up 100,000 corpses or admit that they pulled the number out of their rectum to provide Kerry some more swing votes.
|
And so we took body counts in Vietnam. But when the body counts were summed, one reporter noted that we had killed every N Vietnamese soldier ... three times. But you want body counts. Fine. Just remember, the statistical studies were more accurate. Some instead first learn from history.
Statistics that meet peer review are more accurate than any body count from a war zone. How many died in Rwanda? Clearly they lie because no one counted the half million dead. Rwanda is clearly another scam just like the manned moon landings. Just another way to deny reality. Demand body counts. Then the almighty George Jr must be right.
When the 'powers that be' don't like facts, then they demand the absurd. Its called spin. Your demand for bodies is a classic effort to undercount the dead. Why would you so dishonor such good human beings? Why do you so hate innocent Iraqis?
We have an honest assessment of the dead with a 95% confidence level. Furthermore the assessment met the requirements of The Lancet - that is not trying to cover its political ass. Instead you would believe something that the George Jr administration says? Where is the credibility - and weapons of mass destruction that they invented? 98,000 dead is the honest number. Those who believe Rush Limbaugh types just know that must be wrong. They just know and then make absurd demands. We killed every N Vietnamese soldier three times. The body counts prove it. No wonder you want a body count. Its called denial.