Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Undertoad
It wouldn't be possible to hide 100,000 dead bodies.
|
Same logic that said those aluminum tubes MUST be for weapons of mass destruction. How many people died in your hometown this week? Where are all the dead bodies? Clearly no one has died. The newspaper must have lied.
Do you still believe what the president's spin doctors tell you - or will you finally admit that looting did happen? How many people died even because the hospitals had no equipment and no antibiotics? It must be zero because even the looting did not happen.
UT when are you going to admit that peer reviewed papers provide responsible facts and that the administration constantly lies? We even have these myths about Social Security. The administration spin is 15,000 dead. Nonsense. Same people lied so egregiously as to get us into a war of no merit. The study says 98,000 dead. There is a responsible figure with so much credibility as to appear in The Lancet. Who should we believe - reality or the 'feelings' of UT? Where does the administration put up any facts to dispute this? They cannot and and don't try. That alone is damning evidence.
So where are the weapons of mass destruction? You still believe them to be honest? To say how many have really been killed? And I guess you also see a light at the end of the tunnel? Clearly the White House also must have an exit strategy - or did they invent that also?
The best numbers we have say 98,000 dead - and that the administration is only lying ... again.