Quote:
Originally posted by Hubris Boy
... how about Iraq's failure to comply with U.N. Resolution 687? (The one that authorized those pesky inspectors, etc.)
I've noticed in the past your zeal in pointing out Israel's failure to comply with U.N. Resolution 242 (which sentiment I share, by the way.) Does this zeal extend to all of those wonderful, multilateral U.N. Resolutions?
|
Thank you for providing obvious logic. If the US should unilaterally attack Iraq due to uncooperation with UN 687, then the US should also unilaterally attack Israel for uncoopertion with UN 242, 338 and UN Jenin investigation.
Even worse, only an idiot would plan to attack Saddam after giving a green light to Sharon. It does not matter whether you agree with that sentence since 'green light' is the dominant opinion of the Arab world. Only a fool would attack Saddam when Arab opinion of the US is so universally negative. Even Europe is more in agreement with the Arab world on Israeli Palestinian issues. Why then would anyone unilaterally attack any nation - even worse Saddam?
Bush Doctrine is the 'Axis of Evil'. It is George Jr's agenda - realities in the world be damned. Therefore we can unilaterally attack Iraq and yet financially support Israel - while both refuse to coooperate with the UN or those resolutions. Thank you for noting another double standard from our Administration. Logic dicates that an attack on Iraq should coincide with an attack on Israel and a cancellation of that $3billion we give to Israel so that right wing Likud extremists can bite our hand.