View Single Post
Old 04-08-2002, 10:14 AM   #43
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally posted by Tobiasly
Tw, you seem to have a lot of hatred towards Israelis.. how would you feel if the tables were turned, and the Palestinians became the ones with the more powerful army, making incursions into Israeli land, tearing up buildings, arresting citizens.. would you then be screaming just as loudly against them?
You have accused me of making decisions from emotion. I take that to be a cheap insult because clearly if 'tables were turned', then so would be my posts. Israelis actions here are aggressors because they are led by a government of Likud whose interests are to steal the occupied territories.

If I had the hate as you state, then why praise for Rabin or Shamir? Read the long posts in 'Man vs Tank'. Problems created between the Palestinians and Israelis involves Likud aggrevation. Likud are extremists - enemies of honest humans. Even worse, extremist conservative religious beliefs are central to their thinking process meaning that racism may also be rampant.

Lie, cheat, massacre other people, even invade another country while ordered not to do so by the Prime Minister - do anything to steal land. All logic says Likud is the problem - not Israel. That should have been obvious - if reading carefully. Yes carefully because this is not a simple black and white issue even though I have attempted to simplify it in so many posts.

BTW, what part of 'immediately' does Sharon not understand. He is Likud meaning he has again thumbed his nose at America.

Likud all but called for the assassination of Rabin and got their wish. A little public morning for the cameras. Then they went home to 'celebrate' another murdering of the peace process. There is no doubt that Likud and especially Sharon wants Oslo, UN 242 and all related agreements destroyed. Show me facts otherwise or also acknowledge the evil of Likud.

Stick to logic. Logically you did not carefully read what was posted, or interpreted it according to your own biases. Facts so irrefutible must be stated bluntly - and without being political correct.

You want something nice about Sharon? I also posted that prevously. He is shrewd - like 1930's Hitler. The difference - Sharon's country is not big enough to make world war. Ohhh, Sharon almost did create a world war. Even Hilter's world war would not have been as destructive as the one that Sharon almost created. That's logical fact - no emotion.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote