Kerry's message is jumbled at best
Lookout, your completely right on this count. On the Sept. 7th I wrote a similiar diatribe and condemnation of Kerry's tactics:
"Kerry should be smart to make a mockery out of Bush's so called war on terror by sinking into Bush's admission that a war on terror could never be won, he's right, it's a tactic, not a an enemy, notice Scott McClellan's fancy foot work on that one. Kerry should outline a vision beyond the threat of terror, one that outlines who are real enemies are, existing and emerging, including Bush's "axis of evil", notice he has mentioned these folks in a long time, and set a vision on controlling the proliferation on weapons while neutralizing beds of terroist activity as best we can, simply talking about how bad of an idea it was to go to Iraq is doing Kerry more harm then good, why he keeps walking into an issue that he's been posed as weak on over and over again is beyond me, Iraq should really be part of a larger framework, I think this charge, countercharge environment has limited the scope of what's discussed. This should be his foriegn policy board, and shore up his domestic issue board, which really should discuss outrageous government spending and the 17% medicare price increase, as well as lost manufacturing jobs. He's doing that somewhat well..."
I think this stands as point for what is wrong here. lookout's comments also add to what should be done. I think the amount of leftovers and Dem. losers like Joe Shrum, need to be deep sixed, get them out of there, I can't believe their still allowed to be involved. People like Joe Shrum are something like 4 time losers in pres. races, it's unfathomable. Like I said in my 9/7 post, Kerry's actions are those of a buffudled Washington insider whose best flailings are to call in fringe Clintonistas to try to do the dirty work. Good luck Mr. Kerry.
- Walrus
|