Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 99 44/100% pure
I think it's a hoax; clever, elaborate, but not the real deal.
|
OK, maybe not.
But it would be a clever hoax.
*sigh* What will our scientists think up next?
Or, wait a minute, it could still be a hoax, after all, the sponsor of the unscientifically-conducted annual Loebner competition is this guy.
Does anyone have the time or inclination to get to the root of this? I'm too busy right now.
__________________
Overcompensating for the 0.56% that is irredeemably corrupted.
Last edited by 99 44/100% pure; 07-16-2004 at 11:20 AM.
Reason: But thanks, Wolf, for making me feel less paranoid.
|