Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cyber Wolf
Catwoman,
Doesn't this go back to the whole thing you're talking about in terms of choice? Correct me if I'm reading this wrong, but from the tone of the rest of the post, it seems that man should be more severely punished because of what he's capable of and not necessarily because of what he chose to do, like the person who offered you herion.
Besides, not all physical rape is man on woman. There are male rape victims as well. In those cases, because the above list isn't completely transferable to women, should the women get off lighter because they forced/coerced a man to have sex with them?
|
Oh this is getting tiring. My fundamental arguments are:
1. There are intrinsic differences between men and women that the law should reflect;
2. Punishment should be determined by motive, not a 'one-size-fits-all' philosophy.
If a women
forces a man to have sex with her
against his will she should receive the same punishment as a man who does the same. All I'm saying is it would be a lot harder for a woman to force a man in this way, for the reasons mentioned in my last post. Coercion is different, and should be treated differently by the law.
I apologise if I am not being coherent. Does this make it clearer?