Quote:
Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce
The question is straight forward if you don't try to pick it apart looking for hidden meanings as a cover for not wanting to reveal what a bastard you really are.  |
Bein' a shameless bastid, I need no cover. No, the question sucks, plain and simple.
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
My translation:
When all borders dissolve, state socialists rather than state capitalists ought to benefit.
State capitalism is only a little better than state socialism, but it
is better, so I'd be inclined to
disagree.
I'm thinkin' my interpretation isn't what 'they' had in mind.