Quote:
Originally Posted by sexobon
The gist of the discussion is about long processes that can be quickly checked. Reversible cryptographic hashing would not entail a long process, by which to contrast quantum computing to what we have today; therefore, we must have been referencing proper hashing.
|
Not one fact to justify a misguided accusation. Reversing cryptographic hashes can be a very long process. Which is another hash targeted by quantum computing.
Even professionals who do this research were quoted. What supports those denials? Extremists are taught to demean and disparage another. Since that (and not facts or reality) is somehow proof.
He puts up a strawman. A hash can be quickly checked. Therefore it is not a hash.
Some hashes can be quickly verified (checked by a reverse hash). Others cannot. As demonstrated in previous examples that were intentionally ignored. Since strawmen and insulting others is now the standard for proof. He again does like henry quirk. Since personal attacks is the new standard in the Cellar.