Casino Lobbying and the pro-anti-casino-coalition
 

I've placed a link to this article.

Summary - high-placed lobbyist for two Indian casinos donates money to conversative environment group and to Christian Coalition to target new Indian casinos while steering them away from his clients in an effort to derail a potential rival, the Jena indians.

And they wonder why we are cynical. I want to wash my eyes after reading the article.

The fun thing about this is that someone leaked all of these e-mails to the Washington Post.

Can anyone say "Casinogate"?

Oh, and the FBI is investigating.

It also appears the Jena indians hired their own high-powered lobbyists and got support from their own Republican senators to match forces with Abramoffs hired guns.

Wow, this is like a modern-day episode of "Deadwood". Of course, in "Deadwood", at least one crooked politician got his throat cut.

So in spite of the war, terrorists, neocons, theocons and queers getting married, it's business as usual. Isn't that comforting? :rolleyes:

Why? Sounds like a straightforward case of bought & paid-for lobbying to me. Nothing to see here.. move along....

They may as well. I mean, congress is policing steroids in baseball. We may as well go for broke.

I think I may move somewhere where they have a king or queen or something. Monaco's nice this time of year.....

I'm waiting for the judiciary to step in (again) on that baseball thing if they try too much.

On the Daily Show last night, Jon Stewart showed a clip of one of the committee members quoting a rule that said they could investigate anything they wanted.

Stewart (paraphrased): Anything? You can investigate anything? And you choose baseball?

It's that attitude and that quote that is going to get them hammered by the SCOTUS. They tried that nonsense with gun control in school zones using the premise of it impacting interstate commerce and the court said no.

My question is, who gave the House Government Reform Committee the right to oversee drug use by employees of privately owned organizations? They have no law-enforcement power, anyway.

Is this something to do with the fact that baseball is exempt from anti-trust laws?

Um, nobody.

Where's Radar anyway?

Only in that the exemption is a useful weapon to get baseball to do as its told.

It is WIDELY rumored here in NC that the reason there is no gambling (lottery even) is because the "powers that be" are getting kickbacks from the people running numbers.

That's good. Not the bribing, but the lack of gambling. Gambling does no good to society as a whole. The losers outnumber the winners, and always will.

Right Glatt, lets outlaw everything people might abuse like gambling, booze, drugs, guns, rights, free time, children, peanut butter......... :rolleyes:

What are you thoughts on pyramid schemes then, should they be legal? I think organized, state-sanctioned gambling is worse than pyramid schemes.

I'm not against a friendly bet between private individuals, or even an office pool. I'm talking about casinos, slots, and lotteries, where the house/government always wins in the long run. A local economy may be stimuated, but it's at the expense of the greater community.