Bill O'Reilly is a superfreak. Superfreak. He's superfreaky. Yow.
 

:) Yeah, first Rush and his drugs, now Bill O'Reilly and his sexual harassment. The details of the sexual harassment suit are in the complaint on the Smoking Gun's website. I've seen a few stories in the newspapers, and all of them have made a point of saying that O'Reilly hasn't denied the allegations and that he says his career is in serious jeopardy. Sounds to me like the alleged sexual harassment really took place.

I know that there are skeletons in the closets of both liberals and conservatives, but it's particularly satisfying for me to see hypocrites fall hard. Since the conservatives make a big point of portraying themselves as God-fearing family values folks, they fall a lot harder than the liberals who are more tolerant of alternative lifestyles.

Here's a funny excerpt of one of his dirty phone calls:

Later on he forgets the word "loofah" and starts calling it "falafel"... No better way to turn a girl on than rubbing Middle Eastern food on her.

Oh my god, when I read that, I heard O'Reilly's voice saying it. :thepain2: :vomit:

Like most high-falootin' Rightists, Bill O'Reilly has a superiority complex a mile high, and for some reason seems to truly believe that he controls the moral and intellectual high ground. I love it when people (allegedly...as I believe in the "innocent until proven guilty" concept) commit the same acts that they rush to be first in line to condemn when done by others.

There is no doubt that The Right has one set of rules for them (you know how monarchies are) and one set for others. After all, they're moral enough to know when they're being too sexual, or too stoned, or too greedy...right? Isn't that how it works? They can handle it, but the rest of us common rabble must be *controlled*.

At this point, I think we have to ask ourselves...

Isn't it possible that EVERYBODY'S a perv??

Umm, I mean, except me.

Hey man... self-righteousness is a kind of righteousness, isn't it?

I read this document on the Smoking Gun yesterday, and every time I encountered the phrase "plaintiff was repulsed," I certainly shared the sentiment. This one is a page-turner, but the images it produces are nasty with a capital everything. Gah.

Just imagine his O-face while reading that.

(Okay, don't. Really.)

Didn't O'Reilly write a "novel" (and I use the term loosely) with a scene where the "hero" (and I use the term loosely) goes down on a woman? I think Al Franken had that bit in his Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them.

Those Who Trespass. Here's a quote:

I don't care if Bill wants to mate with animals...people are entitled to their kinks. However, it needs to be someone who is *willing* to be receptive to the comeons.

I predict it will take about five more minutes before someone starts calling her a liar and smearing her own sexual history all over the news.

I'm not so sure people will call her a liar when she has tapes of the phone calls.

The transcripts of the conversations are so detailed they had to have been taped. Taping phone conversations in N.Y. is against the law without the consent of both parties, so they are not admissable in a court of law. But the implication is clear, that there is a record of these phone calls.

Sweet! I can't wait for them to hit the 'Net!

Glatt and Happy....thanks. I was forced into those visualizations and that I will always,always regret. UUUUUUUGGHHHH!
Those eyebrows!!......UUUUgh.
Stop! No more details Plllease!
(there goes my romantic life for at least a week because all I can think of now is uuuggh)

Possibly......take for example the Right Honourable Stephen Milligan, Member of Parliament for Eastleigh who died in 1994......The details of his death are interesting :-

I see, so his case is dismissed for lack of admissible evidence and she goes to jail for wiretapping. :yelsick: